Los elementos subjetivos distintos del dolo, del tipo o del injusto: una inclusión de la jurisprudencia nacional para la descripción de la conducta punible

Abstract

Subjective elements other than fraud, type or unjust correspond to descriptive and restrictive instruments of typicity, which also involve an intentional or psychic component to define the legally relevant risk, but what is the boundary of the judicial reasoning and the process of inference for its structuring? This discussion stands out not because of the inclusion made by the legislator who is presented as a reference, otherwise in view of the hermeneutic rules set by the closing body for some of the behaviors summarized in the punitive statute, in order to be extensible to others with the development of criminal law. The present work constitutes a critical juridical discernment, whose qualitative method takes as inputs the jurisprudence and the doctrine. It is obtained as a result that the instrumentalization that the Criminal Cassation Chamber makes with respect to such institutes may entail an additional requirement in the criminal hypothesis.