La acción pública de inconstitucionalidad y el medio de control de nulidad por inconstitucionalidad, frente a las decisiones del Consejo de Estado y la Corte Constitucional.

Abstract

Since the issuance of the Political Constitution of 1991, in the legal system of the Colombian State have been causing various clashes called "train clash" among the high corporations mainly between the Constitutional Court and the State Council there that the The purpose of the present investigation was to determine the causes that generate jurisprudential confrontations between the Council of State and the Constitutional Court, regarding the Public Action for Unconstitutionality and the means of Control of Annulment for Unconstitutionality to such an extent that it was necessary to study the evolution historical, the scope, the characteristics of the same as also the analysis of the jurisprudential confrontations of the Council of State and the Constitutional Court, with respect to the Public Action of Unconstitutionality and Annulment for Unconstitutionality in Colombia, the present study was justified in pretending to give a p possible solution to one of the most outstanding problems in recent times that has arisen among corporations of different specialties under the quantitative methodology, which allowed to conclude that the type of control of constitutionality being this mixed and the lack of knowledge of the Board of State, Constitutional Court Constitutionality judgments are the causes that generate jurisprudential confrontations between the Council of State and Constitutional Court, regarding Public Action for Unconstitutionality and the means of Control of Annulment for Unconstitutionality generating legal uncertainty.