Responsabilidad Patrimonial del Estado por la privacidad injusta de la libertad

Candil Forero, Angélica Tatiana; Ramos Díaz, Juan Carlos

View/Open

Responsabilidad_patrimonial_privación_injusta.pdf (Trabajo de grado) (474.1Kb)

Carta_autorizada.pdf (Carta de autorización) (235.5Kb)

Date

2018

Author

Candil Forero, Angélica Tatiana

Ramos Díaz, Juan Carlos

Título obtenido

Especialista en Derecho Administrativo

Director de tesis

García Vanegas, David

Publicador

Universidad La Gran Colombia

Facultad

Facultad de Postgrados

Programa

Especialización en Derecho Administrativo

TY - GEN T1 - Responsabilidad Patrimonial del Estado por la privacidad injusta de la libertad AU - Candil Forero, Angélica Tatiana AU - Ramos Díaz, Juan Carlos Y1 - 2018 UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11396/4744 PB - Universidad La Gran Colombia AB - It is evident that every day there is an increase in the number of demands for the means of control of direct reparation, impetrated by the personnel that has been acquitted in a criminal proceeding and they consider that the State has the duty to compensate them for the time they lasted deprived of freedom, even in cases of preventive detention, better known as an assurance measure to guarantee the appearance of the subject to the criminal process. The National Agency for Legal Defense of the State, has stated that within its powers is to formulate public policies in matters of prevention of unlawful public conduct, unlawful damage and the extension of its effects (Decree 4085 of 2011, Article 2), and in recent years has expressed concern about the numerous litigation facing the State in the matter of unjust deprivation of liberty, manifested the need to acquire theoretical bases and empirical evidence to indicate what is the thinking of the high courts in this matter and what have been the assumptions that have allowed the current jurisprudence to draw the dominant opinion on this issue. In addition, it is evident that every day the causes of the patrimonial responsibility of the State have been extended, which can have great consequences in the economic sphere of the State and impede the development of the country. We will provide an analysis from the substantial point of view of the responsibility of the State for judicial activity in Colombia, taking as its main axis the State's responsibility for unjust deprivation of liberty, as that consequence of the damages produced with the provisional prison, determining the foundation of the notion of unlawful damage and relying on the different interpretations of the high courts on the subject ER - @misc{11396_4744, author = {Candil Forero Angélica Tatiana and Ramos Díaz Juan Carlos}, title = {Responsabilidad Patrimonial del Estado por la privacidad injusta de la libertad}, year = {2018}, abstract = {It is evident that every day there is an increase in the number of demands for the means of control of direct reparation, impetrated by the personnel that has been acquitted in a criminal proceeding and they consider that the State has the duty to compensate them for the time they lasted deprived of freedom, even in cases of preventive detention, better known as an assurance measure to guarantee the appearance of the subject to the criminal process. The National Agency for Legal Defense of the State, has stated that within its powers is to formulate public policies in matters of prevention of unlawful public conduct, unlawful damage and the extension of its effects (Decree 4085 of 2011, Article 2), and in recent years has expressed concern about the numerous litigation facing the State in the matter of unjust deprivation of liberty, manifested the need to acquire theoretical bases and empirical evidence to indicate what is the thinking of the high courts in this matter and what have been the assumptions that have allowed the current jurisprudence to draw the dominant opinion on this issue. In addition, it is evident that every day the causes of the patrimonial responsibility of the State have been extended, which can have great consequences in the economic sphere of the State and impede the development of the country. We will provide an analysis from the substantial point of view of the responsibility of the State for judicial activity in Colombia, taking as its main axis the State's responsibility for unjust deprivation of liberty, as that consequence of the damages produced with the provisional prison, determining the foundation of the notion of unlawful damage and relying on the different interpretations of the high courts on the subject}, url = {http://hdl.handle.net/11396/4744} }RT Generic T1 Responsabilidad Patrimonial del Estado por la privacidad injusta de la libertad YR 2018 LK http://hdl.handle.net/11396/4744 PB Universidad La Gran Colombia AB It is evident that every day there is an increase in the number of demands for the means of control of direct reparation, impetrated by the personnel that has been acquitted in a criminal proceeding and they consider that the State has the duty to compensate them for the time they lasted deprived of freedom, even in cases of preventive detention, better known as an assurance measure to guarantee the appearance of the subject to the criminal process. The National Agency for Legal Defense of the State, has stated that within its powers is to formulate public policies in matters of prevention of unlawful public conduct, unlawful damage and the extension of its effects (Decree 4085 of 2011, Article 2), and in recent years has expressed concern about the numerous litigation facing the State in the matter of unjust deprivation of liberty, manifested the need to acquire theoretical bases and empirical evidence to indicate what is the thinking of the high courts in this matter and what have been the assumptions that have allowed the current jurisprudence to draw the dominant opinion on this issue. In addition, it is evident that every day the causes of the patrimonial responsibility of the State have been extended, which can have great consequences in the economic sphere of the State and impede the development of the country. We will provide an analysis from the substantial point of view of the responsibility of the State for judicial activity in Colombia, taking as its main axis the State's responsibility for unjust deprivation of liberty, as that consequence of the damages produced with the provisional prison, determining the foundation of the notion of unlawful damage and relying on the different interpretations of the high courts on the subject OL Spanish (121)

Abstract

Se evidencia que cada día va en aumento la cifra de demandas por el medio de control de reparación directa, impetradas por el personal que ha sido absuelto en un proceso penal y consideran que el Estado tiene el deber de indemnizarlos por el tiempo que duraron privados de la libertad, aun en los casos de la detención preventiva, más conocida como una medida de aseguramiento para garantizar la comparecencia del sujeto al proceso penal. La Agencia Nacional de Defensa Jurídica del Estado, ha manifestado que dentro de sus facultades se encuentra formular políticas públicas en materia de prevención de las conductas públicas antijurídicas, del daño antijurídico y la extensión de sus efectos (decreto 4085 de 2011, artículo 2), y en los últimos años ha manifestado su preocupación respecto a los numerosos litigios que afronta el Estado en materia de privación injusta de la libertad, manifestado la necesidad de adquirir bases teóricas y evidencia empíricas que indiquen cuál es el pensamiento de las altas cortes en esta materia y cuáles han sido los supuestos que le han permitido a la jurisprudencia actual trazar la opinión dominante en esta temática. Además, se evidencia que cada día se ha ido ampliando las causales de la responsabilidad patrimonial del Estado lo que puede traer grandes consecuencias en materia económica del Estado e impedir el desarrollo del país. Se efectúa un análisis desde el punto de vista sustancial, de la responsabilidad del Estado por la actividad judicial en Colombia, tomando como eje principal la Responsabilidad del Estado por privación injusta de la libertad, como aquella consecuencia de los daños producidos con la prisión provisional, determinando el fundamento de la noción de daño antijurídico y apoyándonos en las distintas interpretaciones de las altas cortes respecto al tema

Abstract

It is evident that every day there is an increase in the number of demands for the means of control of direct reparation, impetrated by the personnel that has been acquitted in a criminal proceeding and they consider that the State has the duty to compensate them for the time they lasted deprived of freedom, even in cases of preventive detention, better known as an assurance measure to guarantee the appearance of the subject to the criminal process. The National Agency for Legal Defense of the State, has stated that within its powers is to formulate public policies in matters of prevention of unlawful public conduct, unlawful damage and the extension of its effects (Decree 4085 of 2011, Article 2), and in recent years has expressed concern about the numerous litigation facing the State in the matter of unjust deprivation of liberty, manifested the need to acquire theoretical bases and empirical evidence to indicate what is the thinking of the high courts in this matter and what have been the assumptions that have allowed the current jurisprudence to draw the dominant opinion on this issue. In addition, it is evident that every day the causes of the patrimonial responsibility of the State have been extended, which can have great consequences in the economic sphere of the State and impede the development of the country. We will provide an analysis from the substantial point of view of the responsibility of the State for judicial activity in Colombia, taking as its main axis the State's responsibility for unjust deprivation of liberty, as that consequence of the damages produced with the provisional prison, determining the foundation of the notion of unlawful damage and relying on the different interpretations of the high courts on the subject

URI

http://hdl.handle.net/11396/4744

Collections

Especialización en Derecho Administrativo [225]