Violación al régimen de visitas por parte del progenitor que tiene la custodia del menor de edad

Abstract

This research is based on the violation of visitation by a parent who takes the decision not to implement the agreements reached through conciliation Family Commission and / or other legal entities, which prohibits their minor children share with the parent who does not have custody and thus undermine the fundamental right of children and adolescents to have a family and not be separated from it.This idea came from the need to investigate why such arbitrariness is presented by adults who take advantage of the helplessness of their children to make decisions that affect their physical and emotional development, as the complete absence of one of its progenitors in the growth stage and training generates negative consequences in the difficult person to deal with.This phenomenon often occurs in the Family Commission Kennedy III, since a number of cases reported by a parent who does not have custody of their children who refuse to share with them and what is worse is observed, can not see them, talk or interact with them; so the other parent is making an arbitrary exercise of custody, because without any justification does not allow visits by children with the parent. Therefore the Family Commission proceeds to perform the respective reprimands the offender to what this argues excessive protection of their children, because they are threatened with the parent who and all they want is their welfare father.Such justification simply disguises the true cause of the prohibition of visits, since in reality these parents are facing divorce proceedings or separation of which are in conflict either real or possible infidelities, causing these ruptures; so the other parent embarrasses your children share with the parent without custody, as a means of revenge and retaliation against the litigious processes that are ahead.