Providencias judiciales y discrecionalidad de los jueces administrativos, en demandas de soldados profesionales, que pretenden un incremento en los factores de liquidación pensional

Abstract

This writing leads to a judgment on the judicial decisions issued by different judicial officials at the country scale and the discretion of itself, when failing the demands of the Armed Forces Professional Soldiers, in use of good retirement and pensioners for healing, who claim adjustment to their pension payments. It seeks to show the different criteria when there is a judgement, about granting the claims other denying them, making clear that it is necessary that the Council of the State rules it to ensure among other principles of legal certainty, legitimate expectations, equality and good faith. This leads the ordinary citizens to doubt about the judiciary, since even in the same Council State, there are differences of opinion, when tutelas are established against these court orders, there is no consistency in their decisions, which creates uncertainty among the parties when appeal to the administrative contentious jurisdiction in respect of these claims having the same factual and legal assumptions.