La argumentación jurídica en los actos administrativos generan confianza en la administración pública

Abstract

Legal argumentation is a novel and important element when structuring an Administrative Act, it must be based on knowledge not only of the rules but of the society to which it is being channeled, how adjusted or not this document can generate greater or lesser institutional trust and, of course, the State. When a State is not certain at the time of issuing the Administrative Acts, it loses credibility and with this the de facto actions increase because the population does not feel represented by its leaders, nor by the institutions; what is contrary to constituted power, which emanates from the people. If the State does not manifest itself effectively through its actions, it does not comply with the intentionality of the Constitution and the relationship between the Administrator and the Administration is deteriorated. This document aims to address from the descriptive, the aspects that come together at the time of preparing an administrative document and the possible impacts at the time of being published, making it mandatory in a public context.