• Navegar
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • Trabajos de grado
    • Postgrados
    • Especialización en Casación Penal
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • Trabajos de grado
    • Postgrados
    • Especialización en Casación Penal
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    El desconocimiento de la calidad de interviniente, en el “contrato sin cumplimiento de requisitos legales” y su demanda de casación, por prescripción de la acción penal

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Interviniente_contrato_sin_cumplimiento.pdf (Trabajo de grado) (771.2Kb)
    FIRMAS Y ACTAS.pdf (Carta de autorización) (975.5Kb)

    Date

    2018

    Author

    Raad Hernández, Bernardo

    Título obtenido

    Especialista en Derecho con énfasis en Casación Penal

    Director de tesis

    Torres Vásquez, Henry

    Publicador

    Universidad La Gran Colombia

    Facultad

    Facultad de Postgrados

    Programa

    Especialización en Casación Penal

    Citación

           
    Share
    TY - GEN T1 - El desconocimiento de la calidad de interviniente, en el “contrato sin cumplimiento de requisitos legales” y su demanda de casación, por prescripción de la acción penal AU - Raad Hernández, Bernardo Y1 - 2018 UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11396/5373 PB - Universidad La Gran Colombia AB - The objective of this work is to determine the legal tools employed to present a cassation demand against a condemnatory sentence in which a person is sentenced as an author of the crime “celebration of contracts without the legal requirements” when he really participated as an intervenient, quality which generates the reduction of the prescription term of the penal action as well as the reduction of the maximum penalty. The article 410 of the Penal Code sanctions the public server who in reason of the practice of his functions, celebrates, process, or liquids a contract without its legal requirements or without verifying them. Following this idea, the article 30 of the Penal Code defines the sanction corresponding to the participant in the penal action and in its last paragraph affirms “the intervenient who not having the especial qualities required by the penal type, concurs in its realization, will have a reduction of one quarter of the sanction”. This indent was declared constitutional by the Constitutional Court by sentence c-122/2008. The Honorable Criminal Cassation Room, in the last 15 years has pronounced about the cassation demands for the crime of “contracts without the legal requirements”, in sentences constituting precedents. However judges omit the precedent when they give to the prosecuted the quality of author when he really is a simple intervenient. This aspect has a vital importance at the moment of calculating the prescription term which in case of its production, extinguish the sancionatory power of the state. This can be argued in seat of cassation. Therefore, when the intervenient is condemned as an author of the crime previously mentioned, the due process is being violated as well as his right of defense, because his period of prescription of the penal action is less, which can originates the nullity of the sentence, and impose in seat of cassation a substitutive sentence of ceasing of the process according to the article 39 of the Procedure Penal Code (Law 600/2000). ER - @misc{11396_5373, author = {Raad Hernández Bernardo}, title = {El desconocimiento de la calidad de interviniente, en el “contrato sin cumplimiento de requisitos legales” y su demanda de casación, por prescripción de la acción penal}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The objective of this work is to determine the legal tools employed to present a cassation demand against a condemnatory sentence in which a person is sentenced as an author of the crime “celebration of contracts without the legal requirements” when he really participated as an intervenient, quality which generates the reduction of the prescription term of the penal action as well as the reduction of the maximum penalty. The article 410 of the Penal Code sanctions the public server who in reason of the practice of his functions, celebrates, process, or liquids a contract without its legal requirements or without verifying them. Following this idea, the article 30 of the Penal Code defines the sanction corresponding to the participant in the penal action and in its last paragraph affirms “the intervenient who not having the especial qualities required by the penal type, concurs in its realization, will have a reduction of one quarter of the sanction”. This indent was declared constitutional by the Constitutional Court by sentence c-122/2008. The Honorable Criminal Cassation Room, in the last 15 years has pronounced about the cassation demands for the crime of “contracts without the legal requirements”, in sentences constituting precedents. However judges omit the precedent when they give to the prosecuted the quality of author when he really is a simple intervenient. This aspect has a vital importance at the moment of calculating the prescription term which in case of its production, extinguish the sancionatory power of the state. This can be argued in seat of cassation. Therefore, when the intervenient is condemned as an author of the crime previously mentioned, the due process is being violated as well as his right of defense, because his period of prescription of the penal action is less, which can originates the nullity of the sentence, and impose in seat of cassation a substitutive sentence of ceasing of the process according to the article 39 of the Procedure Penal Code (Law 600/2000).}, url = {http://hdl.handle.net/11396/5373} }RT Generic T1 El desconocimiento de la calidad de interviniente, en el “contrato sin cumplimiento de requisitos legales” y su demanda de casación, por prescripción de la acción penal YR 2018 LK http://hdl.handle.net/11396/5373 PB Universidad La Gran Colombia AB The objective of this work is to determine the legal tools employed to present a cassation demand against a condemnatory sentence in which a person is sentenced as an author of the crime “celebration of contracts without the legal requirements” when he really participated as an intervenient, quality which generates the reduction of the prescription term of the penal action as well as the reduction of the maximum penalty. The article 410 of the Penal Code sanctions the public server who in reason of the practice of his functions, celebrates, process, or liquids a contract without its legal requirements or without verifying them. Following this idea, the article 30 of the Penal Code defines the sanction corresponding to the participant in the penal action and in its last paragraph affirms “the intervenient who not having the especial qualities required by the penal type, concurs in its realization, will have a reduction of one quarter of the sanction”. This indent was declared constitutional by the Constitutional Court by sentence c-122/2008. The Honorable Criminal Cassation Room, in the last 15 years has pronounced about the cassation demands for the crime of “contracts without the legal requirements”, in sentences constituting precedents. However judges omit the precedent when they give to the prosecuted the quality of author when he really is a simple intervenient. This aspect has a vital importance at the moment of calculating the prescription term which in case of its production, extinguish the sancionatory power of the state. This can be argued in seat of cassation. Therefore, when the intervenient is condemned as an author of the crime previously mentioned, the due process is being violated as well as his right of defense, because his period of prescription of the penal action is less, which can originates the nullity of the sentence, and impose in seat of cassation a substitutive sentence of ceasing of the process according to the article 39 of the Procedure Penal Code (Law 600/2000). OL Spanish (121)
    Gestores bibliográficos
    Refworks
    Zotero
    BibTeX
    CiteULike

    Palabras clave

    Interviniente
    Servidor público
    Precedente jurisprudencial
    Prescripción
    Procedimiento penal - Colombia
    Delitos de los funcionarios - Colombia
    Contratos públicos - Colombia
    Prescripción (Derecho)
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract

    El objetivo de este trabajo es determinar las herramientas jurídicas para presentar una demanda de casación contra una sentencia en la cual se condena a una persona como “autor” del delito de “Contrato sin cumplimiento de requisitos legales”, cuando realmente es un “interviniente”, calidad que genera la rebaja de la pena máxima eventual, así como la reducción del término de prescripción de la acción penal. El artículo 410 del C. Penal sanciona al “servidor público que por razón del ejercicio de sus funciones” al tramitar un contrato incumpla sus requisitos legales esenciales, o lo celebre o liquide sin verificar el cumplimiento de los mismos. A su turno, el artículo 30 del C. Penal define y señala la pena que le corresponde al “Partícipe” en la acción penal y, en su último inciso, afirma lo siguiente: “Al interviniente que no teniendo las calidades especiales exigidas en el tipo penal concurra en su realización, se le rebajará la pena en una cuarta parte”, inciso declarado exequible por la H. Corte Constitucional, mediante sentencia C-122 del 12 de noviembre de 2.008. La H. Sala de Casación Penal, en los últimos 15 años, se ha pronunciado sobre demandas de casación, por el delito de “contrato sin cumplimiento de requisitos legales”, en sentencias que constituyen “precedente”, pero que aún hoy se desconocen por Juzgadores de primera y segunda instancia, cuando imponen condenas como autores a simples intervinientes, aspecto que tiene vital importancia, al momento de contabilizar el término de Prescripción de la acción penal que, en caso de producirse, extingue la potestad sancionatoria del Estado y puede alegarse en sede de casación. Por lo tanto, cuando el “interviniente” es condenado como “autor” del delito de contrato sin cumplimiento de requisitos legales, se le afecta su derecho al debido proceso y, de contera, su derecho a la defensa, porque es menor su periodo de prescripción de la acción penal, lo cual origina la nulidad de esa sentencia e impone un fallo sustitutivo de cesación de procedimiento, conforme al artículo 39 del C. de P. Penal (ley 600/2000).

    Abstract

    The objective of this work is to determine the legal tools employed to present a cassation demand against a condemnatory sentence in which a person is sentenced as an author of the crime “celebration of contracts without the legal requirements” when he really participated as an intervenient, quality which generates the reduction of the prescription term of the penal action as well as the reduction of the maximum penalty. The article 410 of the Penal Code sanctions the public server who in reason of the practice of his functions, celebrates, process, or liquids a contract without its legal requirements or without verifying them. Following this idea, the article 30 of the Penal Code defines the sanction corresponding to the participant in the penal action and in its last paragraph affirms “the intervenient who not having the especial qualities required by the penal type, concurs in its realization, will have a reduction of one quarter of the sanction”. This indent was declared constitutional by the Constitutional Court by sentence c-122/2008. The Honorable Criminal Cassation Room, in the last 15 years has pronounced about the cassation demands for the crime of “contracts without the legal requirements”, in sentences constituting precedents. However judges omit the precedent when they give to the prosecuted the quality of author when he really is a simple intervenient. This aspect has a vital importance at the moment of calculating the prescription term which in case of its production, extinguish the sancionatory power of the state. This can be argued in seat of cassation. Therefore, when the intervenient is condemned as an author of the crime previously mentioned, the due process is being violated as well as his right of defense, because his period of prescription of the penal action is less, which can originates the nullity of the sentence, and impose in seat of cassation a substitutive sentence of ceasing of the process according to the article 39 of the Procedure Penal Code (Law 600/2000).
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11396/5373
    Collections
    • Especialización en Casación Penal [29]
    Guías de uso Guía de autoarchivoCarta de autorización de publicación

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister
    Universidad La Gran colombia
    Universidad La Gran Colombia - Biblioteca
    Biblioteca UGC - Koha
    Creative Commons

     


    Universidad La Gran Colombia - Bogotá D.C. Colombia.
    Cra 6 No. 12B - 40. PBX: 3276999
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback