Análisis a la luz del derecho internacional humanitario del marco de justicia para la paz y su relación con la justicia transicional, en la experiencia de paz colombiana

Abstract

After the myriad of atrocities resulting from wars and their multiple disasters in all spheres of society, a new right after the war appeared in the 1990s. Ius Post Bellum, proposed as a figure to do justice after the war. Where the main purpose is that all participants in the conflict, through dialogue and negotiation, create a series of conditions to create a propitious, fair and equitable environment that will give way from war to peace. For this reason, the recognition of the victims within the conflict arises incarnating a new subject for International Humanitarian Law D.I.H., where its main characteristics are based on the clarification of defining who they are and what their rights are. After the above, various debates have originated around the full and effective treatment that victims should receive, since it is a question of restoring their situation to the original state in which they were or in better conditions according to their specificity. To this end, some Principles of International Humanitarian Law have been formulated or formulated, whose purpose is based on three aspects to be studied: Truth, Justice, Reparation and Guarantees of non-repetition, these principles can be evidenced in the text on the commission of human rights in the Colombian peace process.