• Navegar
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • Trabajos de grado
    • Postgrados
    • Especialización en Derecho Administrativo
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • Trabajos de grado
    • Postgrados
    • Especialización en Derecho Administrativo
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Responsabilidad patrimonial del Estado por privación injusta de la libertad a partir de 1991

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Responsabilidad_estado_privación_injusta.pdf (Trabajo de grado) (582.4Kb)
    PRELIMINARES 7.pdf (Carta de autorización) (484.9Kb)

    Date

    2014

    Author

    Pérez Cabrales, Carlos Andrés
    Rodríguez, Álvaro José
    Rojas Rangel, Cristian Andrés

    Título obtenido

    Especialista en Derecho Administrativo

    Director de tesis

    González Buitrago, José Ignacio

    Publicador

    Universidad La Gran Colombia

    Facultad

    Facultad de Postgrados

    Programa

    Especialización en Derecho Administrativo

    Citación

           
    Share
    TY - GEN T1 - Responsabilidad patrimonial del Estado por privación injusta de la libertad a partir de 1991 AU - Pérez Cabrales, Carlos Andrés AU - Rodríguez, Álvaro José AU - Rojas Rangel, Cristian Andrés Y1 - 2014 UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11396/3680 PB - Universidad La Gran Colombia AB - Actually the unjust imprisonment has topped the list of claims against the State using the action of direct repair and foisting against the administration high sums of money damaging the state budget; therefore it is important to know from the law, doctrine and jurisprudence the elements that constitute regimes of State liability, titles of imputation of such liability and actions of control and reconciliation that are actually to analyze what is the most appropriate to treat this clear violation of the fundamental rights of human beings such as life, liberty, good name among others, especially when this deprivation becomes unjust either for the correct and legal act of the Administration or by the illegal act of one of its agents in the process of capturing, the measurement of detention or simply because the alleged infringer did not commit the crime or the conduct was not punishable. ER - @misc{11396_3680, author = {Pérez Cabrales Carlos Andrés and Rodríguez Álvaro José and Rojas Rangel Cristian Andrés}, title = {Responsabilidad patrimonial del Estado por privación injusta de la libertad a partir de 1991}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Actually the unjust imprisonment has topped the list of claims against the State using the action of direct repair and foisting against the administration high sums of money damaging the state budget; therefore it is important to know from the law, doctrine and jurisprudence the elements that constitute regimes of State liability, titles of imputation of such liability and actions of control and reconciliation that are actually to analyze what is the most appropriate to treat this clear violation of the fundamental rights of human beings such as life, liberty, good name among others, especially when this deprivation becomes unjust either for the correct and legal act of the Administration or by the illegal act of one of its agents in the process of capturing, the measurement of detention or simply because the alleged infringer did not commit the crime or the conduct was not punishable.}, url = {http://hdl.handle.net/11396/3680} }RT Generic T1 Responsabilidad patrimonial del Estado por privación injusta de la libertad a partir de 1991 YR 2014 LK http://hdl.handle.net/11396/3680 PB Universidad La Gran Colombia AB Actually the unjust imprisonment has topped the list of claims against the State using the action of direct repair and foisting against the administration high sums of money damaging the state budget; therefore it is important to know from the law, doctrine and jurisprudence the elements that constitute regimes of State liability, titles of imputation of such liability and actions of control and reconciliation that are actually to analyze what is the most appropriate to treat this clear violation of the fundamental rights of human beings such as life, liberty, good name among others, especially when this deprivation becomes unjust either for the correct and legal act of the Administration or by the illegal act of one of its agents in the process of capturing, the measurement of detention or simply because the alleged infringer did not commit the crime or the conduct was not punishable. OL Spanish (121)
    Gestores bibliográficos
    Refworks
    Zotero
    BibTeX
    CiteULike

    Palabras clave

    Privación injusta de la libertad
    Régimen objetivo
    Régimen subjetivo
    Responsabilidad patrimonial del estado
    Reparación directa
    Mecanismos alternativos de solución de conflictos
    Responsabilidad del estado
    Encarcelamiento ilegal
    Administración de justicia penal - Colombia
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract

    En la actualidad la privación injusta de la libertad ha encabezado la lista de demandas en contra del Estado a través del medio de control de reparación directa, endilgando así en contra de la administración elevadas sumas de dinero perjudicando así el patrimonio estatal; por esta razón es importante conocer desde la norma, la doctrina y la jurisprudencia los elementos que la configuran, los regímenes de la responsabilidad patrimonial del Estado, los títulos de imputación de dicha responsabilidad y los medios de control y conciliación que se tienen en la actualidad para analizar cuál es el más idóneo para abordar esta clara vulneración de los derechos fundamentales del ser humano como son la vida, la libertad, el buen nombre entre otros, máxime cuando esta privación se torna injusta bien sea por el correcto y legal actuar de la Administración o por el actuar ilegal de uno de sus agentes en el procedimiento de captura, en la medida de detención o simplemente porque el presunto infractor no cometió el delito o la conducta no era punible.

    Abstract

    Actually the unjust imprisonment has topped the list of claims against the State using the action of direct repair and foisting against the administration high sums of money damaging the state budget; therefore it is important to know from the law, doctrine and jurisprudence the elements that constitute regimes of State liability, titles of imputation of such liability and actions of control and reconciliation that are actually to analyze what is the most appropriate to treat this clear violation of the fundamental rights of human beings such as life, liberty, good name among others, especially when this deprivation becomes unjust either for the correct and legal act of the Administration or by the illegal act of one of its agents in the process of capturing, the measurement of detention or simply because the alleged infringer did not commit the crime or the conduct was not punishable.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11396/3680
    Collections
    • Especialización en Derecho Administrativo [266]
    Guías de uso Guía de autoarchivoCarta de autorización de publicación

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister
    Universidad La Gran colombia
    Universidad La Gran Colombia - Biblioteca
    Biblioteca UGC - Koha
    Creative Commons

     


    Universidad La Gran Colombia - Bogotá D.C. Colombia.
    Cra 6 No. 12B - 40. PBX: 3276999
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback